Start by reading the article “Fallacies of Logic: Argumentation Cons” found in the Argosy University Online Library.
Shapiro, I. D. (2007). Fallacies of Logic: Argumentation Cons. et Cetera. 64(1), 75-86. Retrieved fromhttp://www.thecampuscommon.com/library/ezproxy/ticketdemocs.asp?sch=auo&turl=http://search.proquest.com/docview/204105839
Using the types of arguments listed in is article, respond to the following:
- Draft two original fallacies. Do not identify the fallacies, allow your peers to determine what fallacy your example represents.
Next, using the Internet, respond to the following:
- Research a third informal fallacy not already covered in the text.
- Identify and define the fallacy. For example, appeal to tradition, false dichotomy, etc.
- Provide a citation for your source.
- Construct an original fallacy argument of that type.
- Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
Support your statements with examples and scholarly references.
Write your initial response in 1–2 paragraphs.